Nexans Company Overview: Euromold vs Olex for B2B Cable Procurement

Nexans Company Overview: Euromold vs Olex for B2B Cable Procurement

I'm the office administrator for a 220-person engineering firm. I manage MRO and facilities purchasing—roughly $340,000 annually across 11 vendors. I report to operations and finance. I started handling cable and accessory orders in 2021, and since then I've processed 60-80 POs a year for projects ranging from building fit-outs to small substation upgrades.

When someone asks me for a Nexans company overview, they usually mean one of two things: the global manufacturer, or the specific brand sitting on a quote. For procurement, the useful comparison is Nexans Euromold vs Nexans Olex. Both are Nexans. They don't do the same job.

Here's the framework I use: compare them across scope, technologies, standards, lead time, documentation, and total cost. Then pick based on the project, not the logo.

Quick Nexans background before the comparison

Nexans was created in 2000 from Alcatel Cable and is listed on Euronext Paris. As of its 2023 annual results, the company reported sales of about €6.5 billion and around 28,000 employees across roughly 40 countries. Its core business is cable and connectivity for power and telecom, including high-voltage and offshore wind projects, grid modernization, and industrial applications.

That global overview matters because it explains why two Nexans brands can feel unrelated. Euromold is mostly about connecting cables to equipment. Olex is mostly about the cable itself in Australia and New Zealand. If you order the wrong one, you don't get a bad product. You get the wrong product.

Dimension 1: What each brand actually covers

Nexans Euromold

Euromold is the Nexans brand I see on medium-voltage and high-voltage accessories: separable connectors, terminations, joints, bushings, and cable connection systems. It's the stuff that goes at the end of the cable or where the cable meets switchgear, transformers, or renewable energy equipment.

If your scope includes MV switchgear, wind turbines, solar farms, industrial plants, or utility distribution, Euromold is usually in the conversation. It's not a drum of cable. It's the interface.

Nexans Olex

Olex is Nexans' cable brand for Australia and New Zealand. From the outside, it looks like just another cable catalog. The reality is that Olex is built around AS/NZS market expectations: building wire, low-voltage and medium-voltage power cable, aerial bundled cable, mining cable, and telecom cable.

If you're wiring a commercial building in Sydney or running utility cable in New Zealand, Olex is often the practical choice. It's cable, drum logistics, and local standards.

People assume both are just 'Nexans cable and accessories.' What they don't see is that Euromold solves an interface problem, while Olex solves a conductor and insulation problem.

Dimension 2: Technologies and product lines

Euromold's technology is about electrical and mechanical performance at the connection point. That means stress control, insulation coordination, sealing, torque, and installation tolerances. A 20 mm mistake in connector installation can cause a failure that costs more than the entire order.

Olex's technology is about cable construction: conductor stranding, insulation compounds, sheathing, fire performance, and voltage class. The engineering question is usually: does this cable meet the standard and survive the installation environment?

I keep a simple rule. If the project needs a connector, termination, or joint, look at Euromold. If the project needs meters of cable, look at Olex. If it needs both, don't let the two brands get mixed up in the same submittal without checking compatibility.

Dimension 3: Standards and compliance

This is where procurement gets expensive. Euromold products are typically specified against IEC and EN accessory standards for medium-voltage and high-voltage applications. Olex products are typically specified against AS/NZS standards for the Australian and New Zealand market.

For example, AS/NZS 5000.1 covers polymeric insulated cables up to 0.6/1 kV, and AS/NZS 1429.1 covers medium-voltage polymeric insulated cables. If a project says AS/NZS, an IEC-only cable may not satisfy the inspector, even if the copper is the same. On the accessory side, IEC/EN compliance is the baseline for many Euromold connectors and terminations.

I learned this the hard way. In 2022, I approved a substitute cable for a small fit-out because the vendor said it was 'equivalent.' It wasn't. The cable didn't carry the right AS/NZS marking (surprise, surprise). We reordered, and the schedule slipped by nine days. Nobody cared about the 6% unit savings after that.

Dimension 4: Lead time and availability

Euromold lead times are usually project-driven. Standard connectors may sit in distributor stock, but special voltage classes, bushings, or engineered kits can take weeks. You also need approval drawings and bill of materials confirmed early. If you order after the switchgear is already on site, you're already late.

Olex lead times depend more on cable size, drum length, and local stock. Common building wire and LV cable may ship fast from a distributor. Large MV drums and custom lengths need more planning. In Australia and New Zealand, Olex has a local footprint that can beat imported cable on availability—if the specification is right.

Here's the thing: the fastest quote isn't always the fastest delivery. A distributor can quote same-day and still wait three weeks for a factory release. I now ask for the factory lead time in writing (not just the distributor's promise).

Dimension 5: Documentation, traceability, and invoicing

Both brands should come with normal compliance documentation, but the documents aren't the same. Euromold orders often need type test reports, routine test certificates, installation instructions, and torque specs. Olex orders need batch traceability, drum labels, test certificates, and standard compliance marks.

I also verify invoicing capability before I place any order. In 2021, I found a great price from a new vendor—$2,400 cheaper than our regular supplier. I ordered $18,000 of cable accessories. They couldn't provide a proper invoice, only a handwritten receipt. Finance rejected the expense report. I had to cover $2,400 out of the department budget while we sorted it out. Now I check PO terms, tax IDs, and invoice samples before the first shipment.

Looking back, I should have paid more attention to the vendor's paperwork than the unit price. At the time, the savings looked obvious. The downside felt abstract until finance rejected the claim.

Dimension 6: Total cost of ownership

Euromold usually costs more per piece. Olex usually costs more per meter than you'd like, but less than a rework. The real comparison isn't unit price. It's the cost of the wrong standard, the wrong connector, or a late drum.

The upside of a cheaper substitute might be $2,000 in savings. The risk is a failed inspection or a cable pull that has to be redone. I keep asking myself: is $2,000 worth potentially losing a week of schedule? Usually, no.

Calculated worst case: complete rework at $3,500 plus three days of labor. Best case: saves $800. The expected value said go for it. The downside felt catastrophic. I didn't.

Dimension 7: Engineering support and distributor fit

Euromold support is usually technical: application engineering, installation training, jointing supervision, and connector selection. If your team isn't experienced with MV terminations, that support matters.

Olex support is usually commercial and logistical: cut-to-length, drum delivery, local stock checks, and standard cable selection. If you need 4,000 meters of LV cable delivered to a site in Brisbane, that's the kind of support you want.

The mistake is asking one distributor to solve both. Some can. Many can't. I split the RFQ when the scope includes both cable and accessories, then compare the total landed cost, not just the cable price.

Selection advice: Euromold or Olex?

Choose Nexans Euromold when the project needs MV/HV connectors, terminations, joints, bushings, or engineered accessories. It's the right fit for substations, renewable energy, industrial power distribution, and any scope where the cable-to-equipment interface is critical.

Choose Nexans Olex when the project is in Australia or New Zealand, specifies AS/NZS cable standards, and needs building wire, LV/MV power cable, aerial cable, mining cable, or telecom cable. It's the practical choice for local availability and standard compliance.

Choose both when you have a full power package. But keep the standards straight. Confirm the cable standard, the accessory standard, and the interface dimensions before you issue the PO. Five minutes of verification beats five days of correction.

If you're comparing quotes, don't ask, 'Which brand is better?' Ask, 'Which brand fits this scope, this standard, and this schedule?' That's the question that keeps finance, operations, and the site team happy.

author-avatar
Rowan Whitaker

Rowan Whitaker is a fiber-optic systems analyst covering SFP and QSFP transceivers, OLT, ONT, ONU, passive splitters, optical amplifiers, and CWDM and DWDM platforms. He applies IEC 61280-4-2 and IEC 61300 methods while examining insertion loss, return loss, optical power budget, bit error rate, wavelength drift, dispersion, channel spacing, and transmission reach. His guides help carriers, data-center teams, system integrators, and sourcing specialists compare capacity, interoperability, link margin, serviceability, and migration paths.